Plantar Fasciitis Heel Pain Treatment

Plantar Fasciitis Heel Pain Treatment

 

Plantar Fasciitis Doctor Plantar Fasciitis Heel Pain Treatment Plantar Fasciitis Foot Pain

 

Our Treatment

As we know, the cause of plantar fasciitis is ‘multifactorial’, meaning that it is caused by a number of individual factors (Martin et al 2001).

Consequently there is no single treatment modality (method of treatment), that has been proven to be effective at treating this condition consistently in isolation. Therefore it is essential that we treat plantar fasciitis with multiple treatment modalities at the same time. This is exactly what our treatment package offers.

The content below gives you a detailed explanation on each element which we recommend. The details of the supporting evidence research are fully referenced throughout so that you can be assured that the information is correct and reliable.

Each treatment is broken down into the following topics:

Rationale – this explains the idea behind the proposed treatment

Evidence – the current research which supports its effectiveness in the treatment of plantar fasciitis

Risks – the potential risks of the individual treatment modality

Verdict – this is the professional opinion of our team musculoskeletal specialist podiatrist

Summary

  • Plantar Fasciitis caused by a variety of factors
  • There is no single cure
  • Our approach is based on using a series of proven treatments
  • Each treatment element has to be used to achieve success
  • If followed, the results will be long lasting/permanent
 

Stretching Exercises

Rationale (Background)

Tightness of the Achilles tendon (the large tendon at the back of the lower leg) has long been implicated as a causative factor in plantar fasciitis.

The main effect of having a tight Achilles tendon is reduced ankle joint range of motion, which results in abnormal loading stress on the foot. It is proven that a tight Achilles tendon will result in increased tensile stress on the plantar fascia, (Robert et al 2000) therefore a logical treatment is to reduce this excess stress.

This is easily achieved via stretching exercises which have long been prescribed to help treat plantar fasciitis. The positive clinical effect of stretching as a treatment regimen supports this theory (Davis et al 1994).

Evidence

Research has demonstrated a considerable association between limited ankle joint range of motion and plantar fasciitis. 211 of 254 (83%) patients had limited ankle dorsiflexion (Patel & DiGiovanni 2011). Dorsiflexion is the movement which points the foot towards shin bone.

DiGiovanni and colleagues (2003) compared protocols of Achilles tendon stretching versus specific stretching of the plantar fascia. An Improvement was found in the plantar fascia stretch specific group at 8 weeks in 52% of patients, compared with 22% in the Achilles tendon only stretching group.

It is has recently been found that patients are 8 times more likely to develop plantar fasciitis with tight hamstrings. The Labovitz et al (2011) study results indicate that an increase in hamstring tightness may induce prolonged forefoot loading and through the windlass mechanism be a factor that increases repetitive injury to the plantar fascia.

Risks

Soft tissue stretching exercises are generally very safe, low risk treatment with no common associated risks providing they are done with the correct technique. If you experience any pain whilst performing any of these exercises you discontinue them immediately and consult your medical doctor.

Author’s Verdict

Poor flexibility of the posterior leg muscles (muscles at the back of the leg) is one of the main contributing factors to the development of plantar fasciitis due to the excess mechanical overloading that occurs on the plantar fascia.

There is also a good body of evidence to prove this association. Addressing posterior leg tightness is the most important factor that must be addressed in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Plantar Fasciitis Stretching Exercises

Strengthening Exercises

Rationale (Background)

Strengthening exercises are often overlooked in the conventional treatment of plantar fasciitis. This may be due to notion that strengthening exercises may place further strain on the plantar fascia and worsen the condition.

This notion, to a degree may hold some truth and it is therefore not recommended to perform strengthening exercises in the acute phase of the treatment plan.

However by having weak plantarflexors for example the calf muscles, this will cause an abnormal gait because weakened muscles have diminished force absorption and production capabilities. Therefore increased compensatory stress may be placed on other structures, which can lead to force overload, tissue microfailure, and pain.

Evidence

There is evidence to demonstrate an association of weak plantarflexor muscles with plantar fasciitis and other foot disorders (Kibler et al 1991; ). Although it is not known if the strength deficits are present before injury or whether they are caused secondary to the condition.

The authors from this study (Kibler et al 1991) concluded that a strength deficit of the posterior calf is present in the foot suffering with plantar fasciitis, which creates a functional deficit in the normal foot biomechanics. This deficit either contributes or causes to overt clinical symptoms and should be addressed in the evaluation and treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Risks

Soft tissue strengthening exercises are generally very safe, low risk treatment with no common associated risks providing they are done with the correct technique.

It is possible one may over work a muscle by doing too much of their stretching exercises and over exert themselves. It is therefore advised that you introduce the exercises regime with a modest start with very gradual progression.

If you experience any pain whilst performing the strengthening exercises you discontinue them immediately and consult your medical doctor.

Author’s Verdict

Strengthening exercises play a very important role in preventing recurrence of plantar fasciitis as strengthening exercises will improve posterior calf muscle strength and help optimise gait (walking).

Plantar Fasciitis Stretching Exercises

Insoles

Rationale (Background)

The most common cause cited for plantar fasciitis is biomechanical stress of the plantar fascia, particularly at its attachment to the calcaneal tuberosity (heel bone).

Therefore it is no surprise that Insoles are amongst the most commonly reported treatment methods for plantar fasciitis.

The aim of insoles is to reduce biomechanical stress placed on the plantar fascia by supporting the arch of the foot.

Evidence

Campbell and Inman in 1974, were the first authors to describe success with mechanical therapy using arch supports. They treated 33 patients and retrospectively reported a 94% success rate.

Another study by O’Brien and Martin, in 1985, performed a retrospective telephone survey of 41 patients with 58 painful heels.

Excellent and good results were recorded for 96.7% of the patients, most of whom received multiple therapies. Subjectively, the patients stated that insoles were the most successful treatment modality.

A recently published study by Lynch et al (1998) concluded that mechanical control of the foot via insoles was more effective than anti-inflammatory therapy or accommodative therapy in the conservative treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Risks

The use of Insoles is generally a very safe treatment option and is commonly prescribed to help with a large array of musculoskeletal conditions including plantar fasciitis.

A small percentage of people experience adverse effects from wearing insoles which may include blistering of the skin on the sole of the foot, aches and pains in other joints such as knee, hips and lower back. Wearing insoles should not cause pain.

If you experience pain as a result of wearing insoles you should stop wearing them immediately and seek advice your local podiatrist or medical doctor.

Author’s Verdict

Insoles play an important role in the multi-faceted approach to treating plantar fasciitis. Like stretching exercises, insoles help address and reduce mechanical stress that leads to injury of the plantar fascia.

There is a decent amount of evidence to prove their efficacy in the treatment of plantar fasciitis and are therefore considered an evidence based treatment option which is inexpensive and safe.

Plantar Fasciitis Insoles

Night Splint

Rationale (Background)

The night splint offers a fantastically effortless way of preventing overnight tightness of the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia. During sleep your feet naturally fall into a plantarflexed position (see picture below).

This causes the calf muscles which are attached to the Achilles tendon to shorten (this is known as a concentric contraction) and increase tension on the Achilles tendon which results in tightening of the plantar fascia (Robert et al 2000).

When you awake and put your feet down to the ground to get out of bed the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia suddenly have to stretch back to the ankles neutral position.

This rapid change in tendon length over such as short period causes micro-tearing of the plantar fascia which is why you get an immediate sharp, unrelenting pain response. Because the night splint holds the ankle in its neutral position it does not allow the calf muscles to shorten over night therefore when you put your feet down to the ground first thing in the morning the plantar fascia only has to stretch a minimal amount thus significantly reducing the pain.

Evidence

There has been a number of studies published looking at the effectiveness of night splints for plantar fasciitis which are detailed below:
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery published a study in 2002 which compared 2 groups of patients with plantar fasciitis; group 1 wore a night splint and completed a stretching programme and group 2 only completed a stretching programme.

Group 1 results – All but two of the patients treated with night splints recovered within 8 weeks (97.8%),
Group 2 results – only 57.7% of these patients that utilized the stretching protocol recovered within 8 weeks.
Conclusion – “The night splint treatment group had a significantly shorter recovery time compared to the stretching group” (Barry et al 2002).

Another and very recent study compared two different night splint designs
An anterior night splint – this means the material of the splint covers the front of the shin bone
A posterior night splint – this means the material of the splint covers the calf muscle on the back of the leg.

The results indicate that the anterior night splint is more effective in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. It was also proven to be better tolerated and more comfortable than the posterior night splint (Attard & Singh 2012).

Risks

The night splint is a safe treatment option for plantar fasciitis with no common associated risk.

Ensure the night splint is fitted correctly and not fitted too tight to prevent.

Author’s Verdict

The night splint is an incredibly effective device at eliminating heel pain first thing in the morning which is what almost every patient with plantar fasciitis suffers with.

The reasons for this are explained under the rationale section. The night splint of one of the most important treatment components for plantar fasciitis as it reduces damage to the plantar fascia when the patient gets out of bed in the morning.

This breaks the pain cycle and promotes faster recovery time from plantar fasciitis.

Plantar Fasciitis Night Splint

Massage Roller

Rationale (Background)

Massage involves the manipulation of superficial and deeper layers of muscle and connective tissue, to enhance function, aid in the healing process, and promote relaxation and well-being.

When there is chronic soft tissue tension injury, there are usually adhesions (bands of painful, rigid tissue). These adhesions can cause pain, limited movement, and inflammation. Deep tissue massage works by physically breaking down these adhesions to relieve pain and restore normal movement.

Evidence

Despite its popularity there is a lack of evidence to support massage therapy as a treatment option for musculoskeletal injuries in isolation.

On the other hand there is recent evidence to suggest that massage can play an anti-inflammotory role and aid healing in soft tissue injuries in a similar way to that of non steroidal anti-inflammotory drugs such as ibuprofen (Crane et al 2012).

Risks

The massage roller is a safe therapeutic treatment option to aid healing of plantar fasciitis.

Author’s Verdict

Massage therapy in isolation is unlikely to heal plantar fasciitis as this treatment does not address the underlying mechanical cause of the condition.

It does, however, provide a therapeutic benefit to the patient and complements other mechanical treatment modalities to aid the healing the process.

Plantar Fasciitis Massage Roller

Footwear Modification

Rationale (Background)

There Is an all too common link between poor, unsupportive footwear and plantar fasciitis. Unfortunately this largely due to the modern shoe industry which focuses their shoe designs on fashion purposes instead of what is supportive for a person’s feet.

Shoes should have adequate arch support and cushioned heels. Worn or ill-fitting shoes can exacerbate PF due to lack of proper cushioning.

Evidence

As far as we are aware currently there have been no studies to investigate the effectiveness of footwear change in the treatment of plantar fasciitis, however an interesting case report published in a medical journal The Foot highlighted the importance of suitable footwear.

A patient presented with bilateral plantar fasciitis with a 1 month onset. Following a footwear assessment it was noted that the inner material in the heel of the shoes were excessively worn.

A simple footwear change to new shoes with no other treatment method applied, fully resolved the pain after 4 weeks (Rajput & Abboud 2004).
This study suggests that footwear is often over-looked as a causative factor in the development of plantar fasciitis and is an independent causative factor of plantar fasciitis

Author’s Verdict

The importance of suitable footwear is paramount in the success of treating plantar fasciitis. Unsuitable footwear can affect the effectiveness of treatment or prolong the condition, which might be alleviated otherwise. See our available video on basic footwear advice and recommendations.

Shoes and Footwear For Plantar Fasciitis Treatment

Weight Loss

Rationale (Background)

It is a logical assumption that the higher a person’s total body weight (body mass index), the higher the peak pressure placed on the foot as this is the body’s main weight bearing support structure.

This excessive peak pressure placed on the heel is believed to be a primary intrinsic risk factor for the development of plantar fasciitis, with a large body of scientific evidence to support this claim as displayed below.

Evidence

Research supports the logical assumption above by demonstrating that obese adults experience higher plantar pressures in comparison to non-obese adults (Hills et al 2001).

One study observed that individuals with a body mass index (BMl) > 30 kg/m had an odds ratio of 5.6 for PF compared to those with a BMI < 25 kg/m2 (Riddle et al 2005).

Another study consisting of 1411 patients found that being overweight or obese significantly increased the chances of having tendinitis in general. If the person were overweight or obese, there was an increased likelihood of plantar fasciitis (Frey C & Zamora 2007).

There is an additional explanation for the link between high BMI and plantar fasciitis, Faria et al (2009) found that as body mass index increases, muscle-tendon unit stiffness also increases. This suggests that people with a higher BMI will have an increases risk of a tight Achilles tendon which as we know, increases the risk of developing plantar fasciitis.

Author’s Verdict

If you are overweight and suffer with plantar fasciitis it is of paramount importance that you include weight loss as part of your treatment plan. Ignoring this simple component may prevent a person from gaining the most out of the treatment package as carrying excess weight is linked to plantar fasciitis.

Weight loss can be achieved in a number of ways. Amongst the most effective are diet and exercise. We realise this is easier said than done however there many weight loss programmes readily available that can help you achieve this.

With regards to exercise as a weight loss method we recommend low impact activities such as cycling, using a cross trainer or rowing machine or swimming as these will not cause impact related pain to the heel. Running, particularly on a hard surface not recommended and may worsen your plantar fasciitis as it is a high impact activity.

 
 

 
 

Alternative Treatments

The Information provided below discusses other treatment options available for plantar fasciitis. These treatments are not included in our treatment package as they either do not have a strong evidence base to support their effectiveness, are highly costly, impractical, or carry too many health risks. The purpose of this additional information is to provide our customers with easy to read information on the other treatment options available.

Summary

  • The following do not have strong evidence to support their effectiveness
  • They are costly
  • They are impractical
  • They carry too many health risks
 

Strapping

Rationale (Background)

Taping is one method that has been utilized to biomechanically control tensile forces generated through the plantar fascia ( Saxelby 1997).

The concept of strapping/taping of the foot to treat plantar fasciitis is by reducing excessive foot pronation which has been linked with increased tensile stress on the plantar fascia ( Cornwall & McPoil 1999).

Evidence

There is limited high quality research to support the effectiveness of strapping for plantar fasciitis.

Saxelby and colleagues (1997) found a significant improvement in symptoms with the use of taping, however the study group was very small (9 participants) and was only tested over two days.

A decent study was conducted looking at the biomechanical effect of taping at reducing medial arch collapse. It was demonstrated that there are measurable changes to medial arch height and amount of arch height deformation during gait following low-Dye taping.

Although changes were present immediately after application, results were diminished 48 h after application. The most likely explanation for this is the material fatigue of the tape after 48 hours.

Finally a recent systematic review regarding the efficacy of taping concluded – There is limited evidence that taping can reduce pain in the short term in patients with plantar fasciitis (Van de Water & Speknijder 2010).

Risks

Incorrect taping technique can lead to blistering of the skin.

Too much tension applied by the tape could lead constriction of the blood vessels in the foot and ankle leading to ischaemia (reduced blood supply), which can result in tissue death and amputation.

This risk is further increased in diabetic patients who often suffer with reduced blood supply to the feet and neuropathy (lack of protective sensation).

Verdict

Strapping/tapping, at best, can improve plantar fasciitis symptoms in the short term.

However, mastering a correct strapping technique for self application is not an easy task and is deemed impractical as a self care treatment. There is some evidence to suggest taping is effective at reducing plantar fasciitis symptoms but only as a short term effect.

In order for taping to work in long term it would require the patient to continue to tape their foot over months on a daily basis. More importantly due to the limited existing supportive evidence on strapping as an effective treatment for plantar fasciitis we do not recommend the usage of strapping.

Currently there is no consensus of what strapping technique is the most effective therefore we do not recommend any strapping technique suggestions. On the other hand strapping is a low risk treatment.

Surgery

Rationale (Background)

In terms of treatment pathways, surgery has long been considered a last resort treatment for plantar fasciitis (Thomas et al 2010).

This is largely due to the high success rate (80-90%) of conservative (non-surgical) treatment (Wen et al 1994). However in the other 10% of patient’s, surgery is occasionally carried out.

The idea is that surgical plantar fascia release may provide relief of focal stress and therefore could relieve associated heel pain (Chueung et al 2006).

Evidence

There is indeed evidence that reports symptomatic relief following surgery (Barrett et al 1995).

However, insufficient data of high quality research exists to support the various surgical procedures available for use in the surgical treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Risks

There is no guarantee that surgery will relieve the pain.

Common reported problems following surgery include; stress fractures, lateral column pain, acquired flat foot, and midfoot arthritis (Huang et al 1993; Robert et al 2000).

Author’s Verdict

A avoid surgery at all costs.

Although there is evidence to suggest that plantar fascia release surgery relieves plantar fasciitis specific pain, this surgery is considered a slippery slope to further problems.

There is an increased risk of going on to develop other foot related pain, as the plantar fascia is crucial to normal foot function and support (Brugh et al 2006).

Relieving the plantar fascia tissue of its duty will result in the remaining soft tissue of the lower limb having to work harder to compensate, predisposing to a new problem which can be more painful than the initial heel symptoms.

Corticosteroid Injections

Rationale (Background)

Corticosteroid injections are a common short-term treatment for plantar fasciitis.

They are usually injection in the attachment of the plantar fascia to the heel bone. The aim of this steroid injection is to reduce inflammation of the fascia and reduce pain shortly after the injection.

Currently there is some evidence to suggest that corticosteroids are good for short term relief but there is no evidence to support the use of steroid injections as a long term treatment option.

One of the reasons for this is that a steroid injection does not address the underlying cause of the problem; it merely serves as a temporary pain relief

Evidence
Risks

Unfortunately steroid injections come with their risks. Firstly, as with most injections, steroid injections are a painful experience.

Corticosteroid infiltration has been found to predispose the plantar fascia to rupture and to encourage the heel fat bad to become thinner, which means you heel has less fat pad available to aid in shock absorption. (Sellman 1994).

Corticosteroid injections provide temporary relief from pain and are recommended only in extreme cases, as they may increase the risk of infection and contribute to further degeneration of the plantar fascia and heel fat pad (Roxas 2005).

Author’s Verdict

Best avoided.

In light of recent evidence that plantar fasciitis is more accurately defined as plantar fasciosis, which is a degenerative condition as opposed to an inflammatory condition there is little justification for injecting a potent anti-inflammatory which is not guaranteed to work and comes with risks.

Extra-corporeal Shockwave Therapy

Rationale (Background)

Shock wave is a sonic pulse that results in a transient pressure disturbance that propagates rapidly in three-dimensional space.

It is characterized by an extremly high increase of pressure (50–80 MPa) and a steep decrease with subsequent negative pressure wave (10 MPa). The life circle is short (10 µs). The frequency spectrum is broad in the range of 16 Hz to 20 MHz.

Evidence

The evidence on extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for refractory plantar fasciitis raises no major safety concerns; however, current evidence on its efficacy is inconsistent.

In a double blind randomised trial to evaluate the role of ESWT, Speed et al. have found no treatment effect of moderate dose ESWT in subjects with plantar fasciitis.

The results of their study indicate that moderate dose ESWT delivered using an electromagnetic generator has no significant benefit over placebo.

Risks

Although considered a non-invasive procedure ESWT can be painful and a local anaesthetic injection is sometimes used to anaesthetise the heel which brings about other health risks, including cardiotoxicity, anaphylactic reaction, localised nerve and vessel damage.

Although the technique is widely reported to be safe, there is a potential for haemorrhage and local soft tissue damage through cavitation (Speed et 2003).

Author’s Verdict

ESWT is a plausible treatment option for plantar fasciitis, however it is very expensive costing as much as up to over $1000.

This is a high price for a treatment with limited supportive evidence. This treatment option should only be considered after failing other conservative treatments and as an alternative last resort to surgery.

Ultrasound

Rationale (Background)

There are a number of reported benefits of therapeutic ultrasound when used for musculoskeletal conditions.

Firstly, is the speeding up of the healing process from the increase in blood flow in the treated area.

Secondly, is the decrease in pain from the reduction of swelling and oedema.

Thirdly, is the gentle massage of muscles tendons and/ or ligaments in the treated area because no strain is added and any scar tissue is softened.

Evidence

Despite the rather attractive claims of therapeautic ultrasound, unfortunately there is very limited evidence that active therapeutic ultrasound is more effective than placebo ultrasound for treating people with pain or a range of musculoskeletal injuries or for promoting soft tissue healing (Robertson & Baker 2001).

Risks
Author’s Verdict

Amongst the most come treatment options available for plantar fasciitis, therapeutic ultrasound has perhaps the weakest evidence base for its efficacy.

At best, ultrasound may serve an anti-inflammatory purpose which may aid healing of plantar fasciitis.

However, like other anti-inflammatory treatments, ultrasound does not address the underlying cause of plantar fasciitis which is a mechanical cause and is therefore not considered an essential treatment component.

Acupuncture

Rationale (Background)

Acupuncture has been used for many musculoskeletal pain conditions, including heel pain.

A number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain the pain-relieving effect of acupuncture, including central opioid pain inhibition [9], diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) system [10] and anti-inflammation [11, 12].

Presumably, insertion of a needle at any part of the body may alleviate pain by the mechanisms of opioids or DNIC [9, 13], and the anti-inflammatory action of acupuncture may be generalized across the body

Evidence

A randomised control trial on acupuncture for the treatment of plantar fasciitis was conducted by Zhang et al (2011). The study compared two different needling techniques: The treatment group (28 participants) received needling at the acupoint PC 7, which is purported to have a specific effect for heel pain. The control group (25 participants) received needling at the acupoint Hegu (LI 4), which has analgesic properties.

In the treatment they found a 40% reduction of morning pain at 1 month follow up, which would be of significance to the patient. The control group demonstrated no improvement however. A limitation to this study was that the authors were not able to assess the efficacy of the intended acupuncture treatment compared with placebo. Therefore it is uncertain whether the positive effects from acupuncture were a result of the specific needling technique, a placebo effect, or a combination of both.

Risks

When conducted by a qualified practitioner, acupuncture is safe.

Mild, short-lasting side effects occur in around 7-11% of patients. These include:

pain where the needles puncture the skin
bleeding or bruising where the needles puncture the skin
drowsiness
worsening of pre-existing symptoms

Serious complications from treatment, such as infections or damage to tissue, are extremely rare. They usually occur only as a result of bad practice, carried out by an acupuncturist who has not been properly trained

Author’s Verdict

The available evidence suggests that acupuncture may have positive anti-inflammatory effects on plantar fasciitis pain in the short term.

However, there is no evidence to suggest it is any more effective than conventional anti-inflammatories including ice therapy and non steroidal anti-inflammotory medication such as ibuprofen.

This treatment method like other reported antiflammatory treatments may compliment healing; however it should not be relied on as a long term resolution to plantar fasciitis as it does not address the underlying cause of plantar fasciitis.

Immobilisation

Rationale (Background)

Immobilisation is less frequently used as a conventional treatment for plantar fasciitis in comparison to stretching exercises, insoles etc, possibly because it is less practical to completely immobilise the foot.

Instead mobilisation is used in recalcitrant (long term) cases that have failed to responded to conventional treatments.

Evidence
Risks

Increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (blood clot) due to prolong immobilisation (Healy et al 2010).

Decreased muscle tone and shrinkage of the lower limb muscles (atrophy).

There is the possibility of decreased circulation if the cast, splint, or brace fits too tightly.

Excessive pressure over a nerve can cause irritation or possible damage if not corrected.

Author’s Verdict

Immobilisation can play a very important role in the treatment of plantar fasciitis in chronic cases that have failed conservative treatment and should most definitely be applied before considering surgical intervention.

Once a patient has immobilised the foot for 4-6 weeks to allow healing this should be followed up with rehabilitation programme to prevent recurrence of the condition. Our treatment package is designed to do exactly that.

 

References

Barrett SL, Day SV, Pignetti TT, Rodinson LB: Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy: a multi-surgeon prospective analysis of 652 cases. J. Foot Ankle Surg, 34: 400-406, 1995

Brugh AM., Fallat LM. Sovoy-Moore RT. (2002). Lateral column symptomatology following plantar fascial release: A prospective study. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Volume 41, Issue 6. Pages 365-371

Huang. C. K.. Kitaoka, H. B., An, K. N, Chao, Y. E. (1993) Biomechanical evaluation of longitudinal arch stability. Foot Ankle 14: 353-357.

Cheung JT., An K., Zhang M. (2006). Consequences of Partial and Total Plantar Fascia Release: A Finite Element Study. Foot & Ankle International. Volume 27. No 2.
Christensen TJL., Kravitz JC., Mendicino SR., Schuberth RW. Et al. (2001). The diagnosis
and treatment of heel pain; clinical practice guideline. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 40:329-340.

wen, L. S., Gowlding, P. B., Nutbrown, N. J. (1994). Heel spur syndrome: a retrospective study of 250 patients undergoing a standardized method of treatment. Foot 4:69- 78. 1994.

Robert E., Carlson MD and Lamar L. (2000). The Biomechanical Relantionship Between the Tendoachilles, Plantar Fascia and Metatarsophalangeal Joint Dorsiflexion Angle. Foot & Ankle International. Volume 21. No 2
Thomas JL., Christensen JC., Kravitz SR et al (2010). The Diagnosis and Treatment of Heel Pain — A Clinical Practice Guideline Revision 2010. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery Volume 49, Issue 3, Supplement, May–June 2010, Pages S1–S19

McPoil T and Cornwall M. (1999). Plantar fasciitis: etiology and treatment. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther., 29 (12) (1999), pp. 756–760

Roxas M. (2005). Plantar Fasciitis: Diagnosis and Therapeutic Considerations. Alternative Medicine Review. Volume 10. Number 2.

Robertson VL and Baker KG. (2001). A Review of Therapeutic Ultrasound: Effectiveness Studies. Physical Therapy. Volume 81. No 7. P 1339-1350.

Saxelby J., Bettes RP., Bygrave. CJ (1997). “Low dye” taping on the foot in the management of plantar-fasciitis. Foot, 7 (1997), pp. 205–209
Speed CA., Nichols D., Wies J et al (2003). Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis. A double blind randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Res, 21 (5) (2003), pp. 937–940

Sellman JR: (1994). Plantar fascia rupture associated with corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Int 15: 376
Van de Water ATM & Speknijder CM. (2010). Efficacy of taping for the treatment of plantar fasciosis: a systematic review of controlled trials. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 100 (1) (2010), pp. 41–51
Zhang SP., Yip T and Li Q. (2011). Acupuncture Treatment for Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Six Months Follow. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Article ID 154108, 10 pages

Campbell JW, Inman VT: Treatment of plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spurs with the UC-BL shoe insert. Clin Orthop 103: 57, 1974.

Davis PF, Sevrerind E, Baxter DE: Painful heel syndrome: results of non-operative treatment. Foot Ankle, 17: 527-532,1994

Faria A., Gabriel R., Abrantes J., Bras R., Moreira H. (2009). Triceps-surae musculotendinous stiffness: Relative differences between obese and non-obese postmenopausal women. Clinical Biomechanics, Volume 24, Issue 10, December 2009, Pages 866-871.

Frey C and Zamora J. (2007). The Effects of Obesity on Orthopaedics Foot and Ankle Pathology. Foot and Ankle International. Number 9. P 996-999

Kibler BW., Goldberg C., Chandler TF. (1991).Functional biomechanical deficits in running athletes with plantar fasciitis Am J Sports Med January 1991 19 66-71

Lynch DM, Goforth WP, Martin JE, et al: Conservative treatment of plantar fasciitis: a prospective study. JAPMA 88: 375, 1998.

Martin JE., Hosch JC., Preston Goforth., Murff RT., Lynch DM., Odom Rd. (2001). Mechanical Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. A prospective study. JAPMA. Vol 91 no 2 p 55-62.

O’Brien D, Martin WJ: A retrospective analysis of heel pain. JAPMA 75: 416, 1985.

Ross M. (2002) Use of the Tissue stress Model as a Paradigm for Developing an Examination and Management Plan for a Patient with Plantar Fasciitis. JAPMA. Volume 92. No 9 499-506.

A retrospective study of standing gastrocnemius-soleus stretching versus night splinting in the treatment of plantar fasciitis Original Research Article
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Volume 41, Issue 4, July–August 2002, Pages 221-227
Lance D. Barry, Anna N. Barry, Yinpu Chen

A comparison of two night ankle-foot orthoses used in the treatment of inferior heel pain: A preliminary investigation Original Research Article
Foot and Ankle Surgery, Volume 18, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages 108-110
J. Attard, D. Singh

Pfeffer G, Bacehetti P. Detand J, et al. Comparison of cusUMii and prefabricated orthoses in the inilial treatment of proximal plantar faseiitis. Foot Ankle Int I999;2O:214-22I.

Foot & Ankle International / Archive / Volume 21 (2000) / January 2000 (Vol.21 #1) / The Biomechanical Relantionship Between the Tendoachilles, Plantar Fascia and Metatarsophalangeal Joint Dorsiflexion Angle–Robert E. Carlson, M.D., Lamar L. Fl

Hills AP, Hennig EM, McDonald M, Bar-Or O: Plantar pressure differences between obese and non-obese adults: a biomechanical analysis.
International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2001, 25:1674-1679

Jonathan M. Labovitz, Jenny Yu, and Chul Kim Foot Ankle Spec, June 2011; vol. 4, 3: pp. 141-144., first published on March 2, 2011
Riddle DL, Pulisie M. Pideoe P. Johnson RE. Risk factors for plantar fasciitis: a matehed case-control study. J Bone Joint Swg Am 20()3;85-A:872-877.

Crane JD., Ogborn DI., Cupido C et al (2012). Massage Therapy attenuates Inflammatory signalling after exercise-induced muscle damage. Sci Transl Med. Volume 4. Issue 119.
Rajput B and Abboud RJ. (2004). Common ignorance, major problem: the role of footwear in plantar fasciitis .The Foot, Volume 14, Issue 4, December 2004, Pages 214-218

Additional notes
There is an increased risk of continued symptoms after conservative treatment for plantar fasciitis in overweight patients, patients with bilateral symptoms, and patients who have had symptoms for longer than 6 months before seeking treatment (Wolgin 1994).
Wolgin M, Cook C, Graham C, et al: Conservative treatment of plantar heel pain: long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int 15: 97, 1994.